Antibacterial peptide PMAP-36

Host defense peptides (HDPs) play a pivotal role in innate immunity and have, in addition to antimicrobial activity, also important immunomodulatory functions. Bacteria are less likely to develop resistance against HDPs because these peptides target and kill bacteria in multiple ways, as well as modulate the immune system. Therefore, HDPs, and derivatives thereof, are promising alternatives to traditional antibiotics. Hardly anything is known about the immunomodulatory functions of porcine cathelicidin PMAP-36. In this study, we aimed to determine both antibacterial and immunomodulatory activities of PMAP-36 comparing the properties of PMAP-36 analogs with two well-studied peptides, human LL-37 and chicken CATH-2. Transmission electron microscopy revealed different killing mechanisms of E. coli for PMAP-36, CATH-2 and LL-37. LL-37 binds LPS very weakly in contrast to PMAP-36, but it inhibits LPS activation of macrophages the strongest. The first 11 amino acids of the N-terminal side of PMAP-36 are dispensable for E. coli killing, LPS-neutralization and binding. Deletion of four additional amino acids resulted in a strong decrease in activity. The activity of full length PMAP-36 was not affected by monomerization, whereas the shorter analogs require dimerization for proper immunomodulatory activity but not for their antibacterial activity.

With the increasing bacterial resistance to traditional antibiotics, there is an urgent need for the development of alternative drugs or adjuvants of antibiotics to enhance antibacterial efficiency. The combination of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and traditional antibiotics is a potential alternative to enhance antibacterial efficiency. In this study, we investigated the synergistic bactericidal effect of AMPs, including chicken (CATH-1,-2,-3, and -B1), mice (CRAMP), and porcine (PMAP-36 and PR-39) in combination with conventional antibiotics containing ampicillin, tetracycline, gentamicin, and erythromycin against Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enteritidis, and Escherichia coli. The results showed that the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of CATH-1,-3 and PMAP-36 was lower than 10 μM, indicating that these three AMPs had good bacterial activity against S. aureus, S. enteritidis, and E. coli. Then, the synergistic antibacterial activity of AMPs and antibiotics combination was determined by the fractional bactericidal concentration index (FBCI). The results showed that the FBCI of AMPs (CATH-1,-3 and PMAP-36) and erythromycin was lower than 0.5 against bacterial pathogens, demonstrating that they had a synergistic bactericidal effect. Furthermore, the time-killing kinetics of AMPs (CATH-1,-3 and PMAP-36) in combination with erythromycin showed that they had a continuous killing effect on bacteria within 3 h. Notably, the combination showed lower hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity to mammal cells compared to erythromycin and peptide alone treatment. In addition, the antibacterial mechanism of CATH-1 and erythromycin combination against E. coli was studied. The results of the scanning electron microscope showed that CATH-1 enhanced the antibacterial activity of erythromycin by increasing the permeability of bacterial cell membrane. Moreover, the results of bacterial migration movement showed that the combination of CATH-1 and erythromycin significantly inhibits the migration of E. coli. Finally, drug resistance analysis was performed and the results showed that CATH-1 delayed the emergence of E. coli resistance to erythromycin. In conclusion, the combination of CATH-1 and erythromycin has synergistic antibacterial activity and reduces the emergence of bacterial drug resistance. Our study provides valuable information to develop AMPs as potential substitutes or adjuvants for traditional antibiotics.

The growing problem of antibiotic resistance has attracted people's attention; thus, the search for new antibacterial agents is imminent. In this study, a series of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) based on the porcine antibacterial peptide PMAP-36 were designed by amino acid substitution to develop peptide analogues as new classes of antimicrobial agents. By extending the α-helix and increasing the positive charge, two peptide analogues, PMAP-36PW and PMAP-36PK, were synthesized. The antibacterial activities of PMAP-36 and its peptide analogues were detected in vitro and in vivo. The results showed that PMAP-36PW and PMAP-36PK had a broadened antibacterial spectrum compared to that of PMAP-36. After the modification, PMAP-36PW and PMAP-36PK exhibited antibacterial activities on swine Escherichia coli K88, while PMAP-36 did not. PMAP-36, PMAP-36PW and PMAP-36PK did not have antibacterial activities against Enterococcus faecium B21. PMAP-36 PW had significant antibacterial activity against seven bacterial strains compared to PMAP-36, and PMAP-36PK had significant antibacterial activity against five bacterial strains compared to PMAP-36. Furthermore, PMAP-36PW exhibited enhanced pH stability. Moreover, in the in vivo efficacy assessment of mice infected with Salmonella choleraesuis C78-1 and Listeria monocytogenes CICC 21533, the peptide analogues exhibited an impressive therapeutic effect by reducing bacterial gene copies and decreasing inflammatory damage in mouse livers and lungs, resulting in a reduction in mouse mortality. This study provides reference data for the design of clinically effective antibacterial peptides.