Cecropin B1

Background: Cecropin A is a natural antimicrobial peptide that exhibits rapid, potent and long-lasting lytic activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens, thus having great biotechnological potential. Here, we report a system for producing bioactive cecropin A in rice seeds. Results: Transgenic rice plants expressing a codon-optimized synthetic cecropin A gene drived by an endosperm-specific promoter, either the glutelin B1 or glutelin B4 promoter, were generated. The signal peptide sequence from either the glutelin B1 or the glutelin B4 were N-terminally fused to the coding sequence of the cecropin A. We also studied whether the presence of the KDEL endoplasmic reticulum retention signal at the C-terminal has an effect on cecropin A subcellular localization and accumulation. The transgenic rice plants showed stable transgene integration and inheritance. We show that cecropin A accumulates in protein storage bodies in the rice endosperm, particularly in type II protein bodies, supporting that the glutelin N-terminal signal peptides play a crucial role in directing the cecropin A to this organelle, independently of being tagged with the KDEL endoplasmic reticulum retention signal. The production of cecropin A in transgenic rice seeds did not affect seed viability or seedling growth. Furthermore, transgenic cecropin A seeds exhibited resistance to infection by fungal and bacterial pathogens (Fusarium verticillioides and Dickeya dadantii, respectively) indicating that the in planta-produced cecropin A is biologically active. Conclusions: Rice seeds can sustain bioactive cecropin A production and accumulation in protein bodies. The system might benefit the production of this antimicrobial agent for subsequent applications in crop protection and food preservation.

This study's aim was to investigate whether the cecropin-prophenoloxidase regulatory mechanism is a cross-species physiological function among mosquitoes. BLAST and phylogenetic analysis revealed that three mosquito cecropin Bs, namely Aedes albopictus cecropin B (Aalcec B), Armigeres subalbatus cecropin B2 (Ascec B2), and Culex quinquefasciatus cecropin B1 (Cqcec B1), play crucial roles in cuticle formation during pupal development via the regulation of prophenoloxidase 3 (PPO 3). The effects of cecropin B knockdown were rescued in a cross-species manner by injecting synthetic cecropin B peptide into pupae. Further investigations showed that these three cecropin B peptides bind to TTGG(A/C)A motifs within each of the PPO 3 DNA fragments obtained from these three mosquitoes. These results suggest that Aalcec B, Ascec B2, and Cqcec B1 each play an important role as a transcription factor in cuticle formation and that similar cecropin-prophenoloxidase regulatory mechanisms exist in multiple mosquito species.

Cecropin B1 (CB1) with two amphipathic alpha-helical segments is a derivative of the natural antibacterial peptide, cecropin B. The assays of cell lysis show that, compared with cecropin A (CA), CB1 has a similar ability to lyse bacteria with a higher potency (two- to six-fold higher) in killing cancer cells. The difference may be due to the fact that the peptides possess different structures and sequences. In this study, the solution structure of CB1 in 20% hexafluoroisopropanol was determined by two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The (1)H NMR resonances were assigned. A total of 350 inter-proton distances were used to calculate the solution structure of CB1. The final ensemble structures were well converged, showing the minimum root mean square deviation. The results indicate that CB1 has two stretches of helices spanning from residues 3 to 22 and from residues 26 to 33, which are connected by a hinge section formed by Gly-23 and Pro-24. Lys-25 is partially incorporated in the hinge region. The bent angle between two helical segments located in two planes was between 100 and 110 degrees. With comparisons of the known NMR structure of CA and its activities on bacteria and cancer cells, the structure-function relationship of the peptides is discussed.