Human Histatin 2

Large-volume bone defects can result from congenital malformation, trauma, infection, inflammation and cancer. At present, it remains challenging to treat these bone defects with clinically available interventions. Allografts, xenografts and most synthetic materials have no intrinsic osteoinductivity, and so an alternative approach is to functionalize the biomaterial with osteoinductive agents, such as bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2). Because it has been previously demonstrated that human salivary histatin-1 (Hst1) promotes endothelial cell adhesion, migration and angiogenesis, we examine here whether Hst1 can promote BMP2-induced bone regeneration. Rats were given subcutaneous implants of absorbable collagen sponge membranes seeded with 0, 50, 200 or 500 μg Hst1 per sample and 0 or 2 μg BMP2 per sample. At 18 days postsurgery, rats were sacrificed, and implanted regional tissue was removed for micro computed tomography (microCT) analyses of new bone (bone volume, trabecular number and trabecular separation). Four samples per group were decalcified and subjected to immunohistochemical staining to analyze osteogenic and angiogenic markers. We observed that Hst1 increased BMP2-induced new bone formation in a dose-dependent manner. Co-administration of 500 μg Hst1 and BMP2 resulted in the highest observed bone volume and trabecular number, the lowest trabecular separation and the highest expression of osteogenic markers and angiogenic markers. Our results suggest that coadministration of Hst1 may enhance BMP2-induced osteogenesis and angiogenesis, and thus may have potential for development into a treatment for large-volume bone defects.

Background: The use of salivary diagnostics is increasing because of its noninvasiveness, ease of sampling, and the relatively low risk of contracting infectious organisms. Saliva has been used as a biological fluid to identify and validate RNA targets in head and neck cancer patients. The goal of this study was to develop a robust, easy, and cost-effective method for isolating high yields of total RNA from saliva for downstream expression studies. Methods: Oral whole saliva (200 μL) was collected from healthy controls (n = 6) and from patients with head and neck cancer (n = 8). The method developed in-house used QIAzol lysis reagent (Qiagen) to extract RNA from saliva (both cell-free supernatants and cell pellets), followed by isopropyl alcohol precipitation, cDNA synthesis, and real-time PCR analyses for the genes encoding β-actin ("housekeeping" gene) and histatin (a salivary gland-specific gene). Results: The in-house QIAzol lysis reagent produced a high yield of total RNA (0.89-7.1 μg) from saliva (cell-free saliva and cell pellet) after DNase treatment. The ratio of the absorbance measured at 260 nm to that at 280 nm ranged from 1.6 to 1.9. The commercial kit produced a 10-fold lower RNA yield. Using our method with the QIAzol lysis reagent, we were also able to isolate RNA from archived saliva samples that had been stored without RNase inhibitors at -80 °C for >2 years. Conclusions: Our in-house QIAzol method is robust, is simple, provides RNA at high yields, and can be implemented to allow saliva transcriptomic studies to be translated into a clinical setting.

Human salivary histatin 1 (Hst1) and Hst2 exhibit a series of cell-activating properties (e.g., promoting adhesion, spreading, migration and metabolic activity of mammalian cells). In contrast, Hst5 shows an anti-fungal property but no cell-activating properties. Previous findings suggest that their uptake and association with subcellular targets may play a determinant role in their functions. In this study, we studied the uptake dynamics and subcellular targets of Hst1, Hst2 and Hst5 in epithelial cells (HO1N1 human buccal carcinoma epithelial cell line). Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) revealed that fluorescently labeled Hst1 (F-Hst1) was taken up into the intracellular space of epithelial cells. Then, 60 min post-incubation, the total fluorescence of cell-associated F-Hst1, as measured using flow cytometry, was significantly higher compared to those of F-Hst2 and F-Hst5. In contrast, virtually no association occurred using the negative control-scrambled F-Hst1 (F-Hstscr). CLSM images revealed that F-Hst1, 2 and 5 co-localized with mitotrackerTM-labeled mitochondria. In addition, F-Hst1 and F-Hst2 but neither F-Hst5 nor F-Hst1scr co-localized with the ER-trackerTM-labeled endoplasmic reticulum. No co-localization of Hst1, 2 and 5 with lysosomes or the Golgi apparatus was observed. Furthermore, Hst1 and Hst2 but not Hst5 or Hst1scr significantly promoted the metabolic activity of both human epithelial cell lines, HaCaT human keratinocytes and primary human gingival fibroblasts.