Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (391-399)

Background: The criteria for classifying hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers into low-risk and high-risk subgroups remain undetermined. Supportive data for optimal criteria to identify tumors in the high-risk subgroup are necessary for Japanese patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. Methods: Using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we identified 369 consecutive patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers. We examined the prognostic impact of the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) based on 3 cutoff values, 10, 14, and 20 %, along with that of histological grade (HG) and nuclear grade (NG) by Cox's univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The univariate analyses clearly showed that Ki-67 LI with any cutoff value divided the patients into distinct high-risk and low-risk groups, and that HG and NG were also powerful prognostic indicators. High Ki-67 LI with any cutoff value was strongly correlated with HG and NG, and when these parameters were included in the multivariate analyses, the impact of HG/NG was stronger than Ki-67 LIs. When the 10 % cutoff value was adopted, discordance between Ki-67 LI and grades was frequent in papillotubular-type invasive ductal carcinoma, predominantly intraductal carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma. Conclusions: Any of the Ki-67 LI values, regardless of cutoff value, could be applicable for the classification of high-risk and low-risk HR-positive/HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers. Luminal A/B subtyping according to Ki-67 LI, or HG/NG, in combination with histological type, appeared to be able to create an optimum risk estimation system for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers in Japan.

We report the utility of office-based, nonimaged guided fine needle aspiration of palpable axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. We examine the sensitivity and specificity of this procedure, and examine factors associated with a positive fine needle aspiration biopsy result. Although the utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) of axillary lymph nodes is well established, there is little data on nonimage guided office-based FNA of palpable axillary lymphadenopathy. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of nonimage-guided FNA of axillary lymphadenopathy in patients presenting with breast cancer, and report factors associated with a positive FNA result. Retrospective study of 94 patients who underwent office-based FNA of palpable axillary lymph nodes between 2004 and 2008 was conducted. Cytology results were compared with pathology after axillary sentinel node or lymph node dissection. Nonimage-guided axillary FNA was 86% sensitive and 100% specific. On univariate analysis, patients with positive FNA cytology had larger breast tumors (p = 0.007), more pathologic positive lymph nodes (p < 0.0001), and were more likely to present with a palpable breast mass (p = 0.006) or with radiographic lymphadenopathy (p = 0.002). FNA-positive patients had an increased presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001), higher stage of disease (p < 0.001), higher N stage (p < 0.0001), and higher rate of HER2/neu expression (p = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, radiographic lymphadenopathy (p = 0.03) and number of positive lymph nodes (p = 0.04) were associated with a positive FNA result. Nonimage-guided FNA of palpable axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients is an inexpensive, sensitive, and specific test. Prompt determination of lymph node positivity benefits select patients, permitting avoidance of axillary ultrasound, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or delay in receiving neoadjuvant therapy. This results in time and cost savings for the health care system, and expedites definitive management.